(This is a 2-part article. First read
Part I: What are scriptures?)
The title is always a good place to start. The cover reads: "The Book of Mormon, Another Testament of Jesus Christ." It is
another or
additional testament of Jesus Christ. Believing in the Book of Mormon does not in any way nullify the Bible. It does not replace the Bible. It adds to and expounds upon the knowledge contained in the Bible. Let's use the same criteria used with the Bible, when determining which books would remain as
scripture:
1.
Is it a sacred and inspired text? Yes, though I know that could be considered a matter of opinion, or of belief. I'll come back to that.
2.
Does it testify of Jesus Christ? The title says it does - and those who have read it, whether or not they believe it is scripture, will not be able to deny that it teaches of and testifies of Jesus Christ.
3.
Was it written by (or dictated by) a prophet or apostle? The authors of the books claim to be prophets and I believe that they are.
4.
Does it teach the doctrine? Yes, as revealed upon reading it. It teaches the same doctrines taught in the Bible, and even goes on to explain them in more detail and I believe, with greater clarity.
Jesus Christ told us: "And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd." (John 10:16) Even at the time of Christ's coming there were people elsewhere in the world. Some of them would have been part of the scattered and lost tribes of Israel, but they were not lost to Christ. He knew them and He loved them as this scripture explains. We believe that the Book of Mormon is a record of one of those scattered groups.
"The Book of Mormon is a volume of holy scripture comparable to the Bible. It is a record of God's dealings with ancient inhabitants of the Americas and contains the fulness of the everlasting gospel" (
Book of Mormon, Title Page.)
So again I ask the question: Why? What need is there for another testament of Jesus Christ, when the Bible already testifies and teaches of Him?
To illustrate, I'm going to relay an analogy that my husband Austin tells. But before I do, consider these two scriptures, one from the Old Testament and one from the New Testament:
"At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, he shall that is worthy of death be put to death; but at the mouth of one witness he shall not be put to death." (
Deuteronomy, 17:6)
". . . in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established." (
Matthew 18:16)
Now for
Austin's Witness Analogy:
There was a man who had to go to court to prove whether a certain event did or did not happen. He claimed it did, but the prosector argued it did not. A judge and jury were apart of the proceedings, to decide for against the accused. He had one single witness who was willing to testify for him. Not only was there only one witness, but that witness was the brother of the accused (I will call this man Witness A). Witness A gave a compelling tale that was convincing and corroborated with much of the evidence, but the jury was not completely convinced because of the single witness and also because of his relation to the accused that could mean he was biased. Fortunately, as the trial was coming to a close, a second witness came forward (Witness B). Witness B was not related to the accused but had seen the entire thing. Not only was he able to testify so that the brother's testimony was confirmed, but because he was in a different location than Witness A, he had a different perspective from which he was also able to add details. His story added clarity and understanding so that the jury was left without any doubt of the truth.
What I am suggesting, and what this analogy intends to illustrate, is that the Bible is like the first witness of Jesus Christ. It is so closely linked to Him and related to Him in every way that sometimes it is taken into question. Sometimes the details within it feel confusing or subjective. The Book of Mormon is the second witness of Jesus Christ. It is able to clarify the confusion and make straight that which seems subjective. It is meant to unify and add unto the testimonies of the prophets and apostles in the Bible. That is why we, as Latter-Day Saints, read
both sets of scriptures. We believe that when they are used in conjunction with one another, the principles and doctrines of the Gospel of Jesus Christ are made plain and simple to understand. Thus instead of having only one witness, we have two witnesses.
The beauty of the Book of Mormon is that you don't have to believe me. You don't have to "take my word for it." At the very end of the Book of Mormon a prophet named Moroni made an invitation:
"Behold I would exhort you that when ye shall read these things, if it be wisdom in God that ye should read them, that ye would remember how merciful the Lord hath been unto the children of men, from the creation of Adam even down until the time that ye shall receive these things, and ponder it in your hearts.
And when ye shall receive these things, I would exhort you that ye would ask God, the Eternal Father, in the name of Christ, if these things are not true; and if ye shall ask with a sincere heart, with real intent, having faith in Christ, he will manifest the truth of it unto you, by the power of the Holy Ghost.
And by the power of the Holy Ghost ye may know the truth of all things.
And whatsoever thing is good is just and true; wherefore nothing that is good denieth the Christ, but acknowledgeth that he is.
And ye may know that he is, by the power of the Holy Ghost; wherefore I would exhort you that ye deny not the power of God; for he worketh by power, according to the faith of the children of men, the same today and tomorrow, and forever."
(Similar scriptures in the Bible about asking God and receiving answer:
James 1:5-6;
Matthew 7:7-12)
So is the Book of Mormon truly scripture or not? The 4 points of criteria at the beginning are good stepping stones for understanding how to recognize scripture, but they are still subjective, dependent upon one's opinions or beliefs.
So again, how can we know?
Here's what I know: truth is truth. Either the Book of Mormon is false and Joseph Smith was the biggest con-man in the history of the world, or the Book of Mormon is true and Joseph Smith was a prophet called by God to translate the scriptures and restore the Gospel of Jesus Christ in its fullness to the earth. I cannot answer for anyone else if the Book of Mormon is true or not. For anyone that really wants to know, you have to go to the source of all truth: God. Moroni echos the testimonies of Matthew and James with his promise: to pray to Heavenly Father in the name of Jesus Christ, asking with faith, and that you will receive an answer.
I've read the Book of Mormon and the Bible, many times now. I've prayed and received my answer. I'm betting you can guess what it was. I would encourage everyone to never be afraid of questions and never be afraid of the possibility that there is more knowledge that Heavenly Father can give us, He wants to give us, and has provided a way for us to receive. My perspective is where's the harm in asking? Where's the risk in testing Moroni's promise?
In case anyone is interested in learning more, please ask any questions! We are all searching for more truth and understanding and can learn and grow together.
For any interested, a free Book of Mormon is available
here.